I’m supposed to be watching as many bits and pieces of disability-relevant Reality TV Shows as I can get my hands on, to beef up my scope of experience for my podcast discussion with Emily Ladau. We are scheduled to talk by Skype on Friday. I hope to post the podcast episode on Monday, March 23.
What I’ve actually been doing is watching the first 5 seasons of M*A*S*H on Netflix. It’s not a complete waste of time though. I have found a bit of a disability story, about a college football running back who has his wounded leg amputated at the 4077th. Season 5, Episode 18 “End Run.” There’s nothing very interesting in the portrayal of disability, but that, in itself is kind of interesting. It isn’t as horrible as one might imagine, but the story does lean heavily on an extremely familiar trope of disability on TV … the angry cripple who needs a kind but tough non-disabled person to persuade them that life is worth living after all. It’s fairly subtle at the end, more so than most mid-‘70s sitcoms usually managed, but the great insight struck me as pretty by-the-numbers and simplistic to me. Plus, the solution was completely metaphorical stuff about “trying”. Nobody mentioned a single specific idea for what this BLACK GUY might DO in the 1950s, without a football career and missing a leg.
My watch list for future episodes of Disability.TV is also extensive. For instance:
- I hope to do a discussion soon about disability onDownton Abbey, but for better or worse, I’ve got that whole damned series pretty much memorized, so that’s something.
Fortunately, future podcasts should be easier to do and less scattered to listen to using a new 5-star rating system, introduced in Disability.TV Episode 20. Each TV show will either gain or lose a star for each of the following criteria:
Authenticity …Getting the details of disability right.
Characters … Are disabled characters fully developed, and not cliché.
Messages … What the show says about disability.
Representation … Are disabled characters played by disabled actors?
Watchability … Is the show any good?
Try these criteria on the disability shows and movies you see. It’s fun!
Now there’s something I need to grouse about.
I have been participating off and on with the #FilmDis Twitter discussions that happen every Saturday evening at 9 PM Eastern. I highly recommend it to anyone interested in disability on film or TV. One thing I really appreciate about the group is that it has raised my consciousness about the artistic pitfalls and above all the injustice of non-disabled actors playing disabled characters, sometimes called "Cripface", but probably better termed "Cripping Up." Most of the rare disability roles written are cast this way. Meanwhile, actual actors with disabilities can’t get work. It’s an important issue that colors the entire topic of disability in popular culture.
However, this poses an added dilemma for me. I remain fascinated by the themes, messages, and ideas expressed when disability is depicted in popular culture, especially on TV. I find it equally fascinating regardless of who plays the parts. Maybe it’s because I am just more attuned to writing than I am to acting, but while I find “cripping up” offensive and unjust, I also find that it doesn’t much affect my interest in what the show says about disability. For better or worse, content is really my thing, and whether or not disabled actors play disabled characters in a piece is only one part of how I judge a work overall (see above). Maybe six months or a year from now “cripping up” will be more of a deal-breaker for me, as it is for a lot of disabled people. At the moment, for me, it isn’t. I’m not sure I know how to feel about that.